Britney Spears Crotch– Britney goes Commando

December 9, 2006 at 2:31 pm | Posted in Feminism, Politics | 1 Comment

 So Britney goes commando for all to see.  Bravo! I say!  With her big pussy lips out there for all to see it’s obvious she has shed the traditions of the past (as well as her fashionable panties)!  Showing off her brazilian wax, that brazenly hairless snatch it’s obvious she’s one of us, whether by wax or by a nice close shave, I applaud her for getting rid of that bush!  I mean hell, this is SO MUCH BETTER, so much a better use of her time and money than the previous actions —-this REALLY makes for a better blowjob, right?  Yes, this is so much better than just a trim on the old poontang, if you’re gonna do it, do it ALL THE WAY!  No half-assed job will do!  And, by shaving it ALL off, by making sure it’s a truly nude twat,  it brings light to the beauty of lusty hot lesbian sex .  Reminds me of that juicy shot in Something About Mary where after all the work he went to for the big cum-shot, she uses his jizz as hair-gel, gotta love it!  Speaking of Mary, or Cameron Diaz, that’s another naked taco that would be nice to see!

Commando:

Two of the Nuremberg trial defendants, Field Marshall Wilhelm Keitel and Gen. Alfred Jodl, were sentenced to death on Oct. 1, 1946, in part, for delegating Hitler’s infamous “commando order.” Hitler ranted that allied commandos who attacked German troops by stealth were not soldiers but common criminals. Gangsters, he added, were not covered by the Geneva Convention.

Substitute the word “enemy combatants” for “gangsters,” and the Bush administration’s approach is certainly rooted in precedent. Moreover, the law doesn’t abandon the Geneva Convention. It merely allows leeway in interpreting old-fashioned notions about what constitutes torture.

Source: US Must Follow Nuremberg Code

Shed the traditions of the past:

Habeas Corpus? Gone.

The Geneva Conventions? Optional.

Source: Crooks and Liars » Countdown Special Comment: Death of Habeas Corpus: “Your words are lies, Sir.”

Fashionable panties:

In fact, Countdown has obtained a partially redacted copy of a colonial “declaration” indicating that back then, “depriving us of Trial by Jury” was actually considered sufficient cause to start a War of Independence, based on the then-fashionable idea that “liberty” was an unalienable right.

    Today, thanks to modern, post-9/11 thinking, those rights are now fully alienable.

    The reality is, without habeas corpus, a lot of other rights lose their meaning.

    But if you look at the actual Bill of Rights – the first ten amendments to that pesky Constitution – you’ll see just how many remain.

Source: Keith Olbermann | Why Does Habeas Corpus Hate America

Getting rid of that Bush:

At the heart of the charges contained in McKinney’s articles of impeachment is the allegation that President Bush has not upheld the oath of presidential office and is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors.

Article I states that President Bush has failed to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution.

Source: McKinney Introduces Bill to Impeach Bush

Better blowjob:

Everyone agreed that it was not the sex. It was the lying, right? If having extramarital sex in the White House were an impeachable offense, the impeachment of presidents would long ago have become a routine affair. We’d have seen Roosevelt, Ike, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon and Bush the Elder in the dock for sure, and maybe Ron, too.

But everyone agreed it wasn’t the sex that got President Clinton in trouble. It was the lying. The audacious bending of the meaning of the word is and the word sex. Right?

But has lying ever been practiced so blatantly as it is being practiced today in the White House?

Source: Dave Lindorff: Clinton, Bush, Lies and Impeachment

ALL THE WAY:

Impeach_cheney

IMPEACH CHENEY

No half-assed job will do:

“Impeaching Bush would give us Cheney, who is worse.”

By proposing to impeach Cheney first, we eliminate this fear.

Source: Scoop: David Swanson: Impeach Cheney First

Nude twat:

But a removal of the President which put Cheney into power, would be the height of stupidity, as well as bringing on catastrophe. Already, we see the enraged Cheney moving toward an accelerated war drive in the Southwest Asian region. While it is by no means clear that he will, or can, be successful, the danger must be recognized as acute.

Source: ‘Impeach Cheney First’

Hot lesbian sex

From “Concerned Women for America,” Janice Crouse,  “Mary‘s pregnancy is an in-you-face action, countering the Bush administrations pro-family, pro-marriage and pro-life policies.  She continues to repudiate the work to which her father has devoted his life.”

OLBERMANN: Joining me for some comment on this, the host of the “Sam Seder Show” on Air America, also author of “F.U.B.A.R., Fubar, America‘s Right Wing Nightmare,” Sam Seder.  Thanks for your time again, sir. 

SAM SEDER, AUTHOR, “FUBAR”:  Thank you Keith. 

OLBERMANN:  Or is this, Sam, just the opposite of that last remark, that the vice president‘s work is repudiating his daughter, and now the grandchild that he‘s supposed to love the whole of his life and what the hell does that say about the supposed superiority of the traditional marriage?

SEDER:  Yes, I mean exactly, for a guy who‘s willing to shoot his friends in the face, you would think he would stick up for his daughter and his future grandchild.

Source: Crooks and Liars » Sam Seder with Keith Olbermann 

Something About Mary

Now, it turns out, she’s back with a vengeance and a fetus– thanks to frozen sperm, mail-ordered just in time for Christmas!

Weren’t we promised compassionate conservatives? Instead, we got people who raise people like Mary Cheney– A person so at war with her own values that the only people defending her pregnancy today are the gay rights groups that she campaigned to destroy.

Look, I’m no fan of Mary Cheney; her self-serving phony-baloney “outrage” at Kerry, for instance, for daring to mention the fact that she’s a lesbian when he was DEFENDING gay and lesbian rights is one of the most sickening moments of that last sickening Presidential election.

Those so-called “family” groups who are shocked that some rich white woman is having a baby without a “father” should be shot and pissed upon, and not in that order. Um…where are they when teenage girls get pregnant and those “dads” take off on them??

(and remember, it’s those same “family” groups opposing birth control~~juxta)

Mary Cheney……just one more of the hypocrisies coming from the Repukes. While her father’s “friends” worry about this child not having a father, it doesn’t seem to concern them when they are fighting to stop abortions.

The line that gets me is “It’s very disappointing that a celebrity couple like this would deliberately bring into the world a child that will never have a father”
If having a father is so gosh darn important, perhaps we should stop deliberately sending young men with pregnant wives (and girlfriends) off to get killed in the Middle East.

Why, oh why, isn’t she rescuing one of those frozen embryos and having a “snowflake” baby – as I think Jon Stewart snarkily (although not necessarily accurately) put it, each unique and all white?

Simply put, this announcement suggests: We the deciders get to set rules for you which do not apply to us. Sound familiar? A central tenet of this administration’s political gambit has been this anti gay family issue. They have backed it 100% – much to the detriment of others. It (and their entire philosophy) is one big shell game. There most certainly is something about Mary – something very, very sad – indeed.

This is an ideal time for Mary Cheney and her life partner, as well as all good war supporting Republicans and the good folks on the Christian Right, to adopt one or more Iraqi orphans. The media should hound all of them on this.

Are there any blonde, blue eyed, lily-white Iraqi orphans?

 I wish she would take a public stand but she won’t. Any why should we expect her to be any different than the rest of the people associated with this administration. She has the same ‘I got mine, screw everybody else’ mentality.

A woman named Mary is with child without having sex with a man.
In a roundabout kind of way, the story has a Christmasy feel to it.

My Christmas message to the Cheneys: go fuck yourselves.

Source: The Blog | Bill Robinson: There’s Something About Mary Cheney (the sequel) | The Huffington Post

Diaz

President-elect Felipe Calderon also criticized the plan, saying one  “could stop more migrants with a kilometre of new roads and development [in Mexico] than with a wall.”

Source: Mexico urges U.S. to scrap border fence plan

 Naked Taco:

Wilson said he told the man in the desert that if he goes north, he would be dead in a few hours. The man said he would rather die in the desert than return to Mexico and watch his wife, who needs surgery, and his children, starve to death.

Source: Fence Protest at Arizona-Mexico Border Summit

And that’s the end of my post about Britney’s crotch, cunt, bearded clam (er…formerly bearded)!  Thanks! Oh, and teen webcam!

1 Comment »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

  1. I think it’s only a matter of time before Britney runs over a photographer and kills ‘em. What happened to that sweet old Britney we used to know and love?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com. | The Pool Theme.
Entries and comments feeds.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: