Disputed Florida Election to Spill Onto House Floor
December 29, 2006 at 4:10 pm | In Feminism, Law, Politics | Leave a CommentJohn Boehner is a liar. So is his mouthpiece Kevin Smith.
Rep. Rush Holt, a New Jersey Democrat who has pushed for better safeguards on electronic voting machines, said on Friday that he will make a procedural point to establish that the swearing-in of Florida Republican Vern Buchanan does not prejudice ongoing challenges by his Democratic opponent, Christine Jennings.
”This is a district, Sarasota area in Florida, where there’s no way of knowing whether the result presented by Florida’s secretary of state is valid. In fact, I think there is significant evidence that it is not,” Holt told reporters.
Buchanan was certified the winner of the November 7 election by a 369-vote margin. But oddly, about 18,000 ballots in Sarasota County had no votes recorded for the disputed House race, while other races on those same ballots were voted upon.
Kevin Smith, a spokesman for House Republican leader John Boehner, said the matter is settled.
”Florida authorities conducted a thorough audit of the voting machines used in the district and found no system breakdowns or abnormalities.” He added, “The election is over. Vern Buchanan won.”
Paul Krugman | A Failed Revolution
December 29, 2006 at 12:08 pm | In Politics | Leave a Comment
As long as people like Mr. Armey, Newt Gingrich and Tom DeLay were out of power, they could run on promises to eliminate vast government waste that existed only in the public’s imagination – all those welfare queens driving Cadillacs. But once in power, they couldn’t deliver.
That’s why government by the radical right has been an utter failure even on its own terms: the government hasn’t shrunk. Federal outlays other than interest payments and defense spending are a higher percentage of G.D.P. today than they were when Mr. Armey wrote his book: 14.8 percent in fiscal 2006, compared with 13.8 percent in fiscal 1995.
Unable to make good on its promises, the G.O.P., like other failed revolutionary movements, tried to maintain its grip by exploiting its position of power. Friends were rewarded with patronage: Jack Abramoff began building his web of corruption almost as soon as Republicans took control. Adversaries were harassed with smear campaigns and witch hunts: Congress spent six years and many millions of dollars investigating a failed land deal, and Bill Clinton was impeached over a consensual affair.
But it wasn’t enough. Without 9/11, the Republican revolution would probably have petered out quietly, with the loss of Congress in 2002 and the White House in 2004. Instead, the atrocity created a window of opportunity: four extra years gained by drowning out unfavorable news with terror alerts, starting a gratuitous war, and accusing Democrats of being weak on national security.
Yet the Bush administration failed to convert this electoral success into progress on a right-wing domestic agenda. The collapse of the push to privatize Social Security recapitulated the failure of the Republican revolution as a whole. Once the administration was forced to get specific about the details, it became obvious that private accounts couldn’t produce something for nothing, and the public’s support vanished.
In the end, Republicans didn’t shrink the government. But they did degrade it. Baghdad and New Orleans are the arrival destinations of a movement based on deep contempt for governance.
Abortion
December 29, 2006 at 10:48 am | In Domestic Violence, Feminism, Law, Politics, birth | 2 Comments
We continue to insist that it’s women who are the nurturing ones. Men are discouraged from showing compassion or learning how to take care of the young. In popular culture, masculinity is increasingly portrayed as a red-meat eating, woman-hating, Hummer-driving cartoon. Yet in spite of this, opponents of abortion insist that these same nurturing women should not be in the position of determining when to reproduce. Here’s the logic: we are “naturally” connected to children in a way men are not, but we are somehow wrong when we say we know we do not have the room and resources to give birth to and support a baby. So bizarre. So anti-woman. So illogical.
Meanwhile our “pro-life” conservative administration sends thousands of mother’s children off to die in Iraq, sends thousands of mother’s children to kill other mother’s children–and their mothers as well. A new book reports that the people Halliburton chose to “reconstruct” Iraq, meaning reap billions in profit, had to be anti-abortion in order to qualify for the job. So bizarre. So anti-woman. So illogical.
When a woman tells me she wants a child, I respect that choice. When a woman tells me she does not, I respect that choice as well. When technological advances make it possible to safely terminate an unwanted pregnancy but ancient sexist superstition and current-day contempt for female freedom militate against access to this solution, I shake my head, grit my teeth, and gird my loins for battle.
Specialization is for Insects
December 29, 2006 at 8:31 am | In Spirit | Leave a Comment
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.
-Robert A. Heinlein
No More Victims
December 28, 2006 at 9:05 am | In Politics | Leave a Comment
We can’t allow ourselves to get to the point of not feeling something when looking at a child who has been injured in war! We should all feel something. Whether it’s anger because our tax dollars helped pay for the destruction, or because we have a child and can’t imagine telling him/her that there’s nothing we can do. The truth is that it’s okay to cry. In fact, it’s healthy. We should never allow ourselves to stop feeling for others. We should never allow ourselves to judge each other over religion or ethnicity or skin tone. It’s not “un-American” or “un-Democratic” to care about the Iraqis. It’s allowing ourselves to be human. It’s about understanding that it could have been any one of us. We could have been born anywhere. We are not in control of our ethnicity. But, we are privileged to live in America. Let us never forget that. And privilege confers responsibility.
Alaa’ left Florida a little over a year ago. Since then, a civil war has broken out. Many children were not as lucky as Alaa’; many are dead. Many families have been destroyed. We can attempt to justify our invasion of Iraq, but I think it takes a bigger person to admit being wrong. And, what I think makes our country so great is that we have the ability to dissent. We can stand up for what we think is right.
I have been asked by many skeptics if I think it would have been better with Saddam. They don’t bother to mention that the US supported Saddam right through the worst of his atrocities. And I doubt they complained about the policy of “support for Saddam” at the time. I’m not an oracle, but I think a fair response is that it would have been better for Alaa’. It would have been better if her home had not been hit by US tank rounds, which took the lives of her two brothers.
Alaa’ is young. Fortunately, she may not remember all that took place on that horrific day. She won’t remember having a tea party with her siblings as her home crumbled, burying her brothers in the rubble. But, she’ll always have the scars. She’ll see pictures to remind her of her two brothers that she never had the opportunity to know. And, ten years from now, my children will see pictures in their history books and only read text that whitewashes our role in the destruction. How the story is told depends on us, and it needs to be one of truth.
Source: Ashley Severance | No More Victims Group Continues to Aid Iraqi Children
Kelo case
December 27, 2006 at 4:20 pm | In Feminism, Law, Politics | Leave a CommentEh, spells, prayers, whatever….once our rights are gone none of that’s going to do any good.
a case where a multiscreen movie theater owner got his town government to appropriate land ostensibly to widen a road, but actually so that he could expand his parking lots enough to get a zoning variance to expand his theater. After the town took title to the land, it turned around and sold it at cost to the theater owner, because “traffic studies” suddenly, miraculously demonstrated that the road didn’t need widening after all. After several years and thousands of dollars in legal fees, the family that had its land taken got some justice in the form of some additional compensation, but it wasn’t much more than what they had paid their lawyer, and they never got their land back. My fear is that Kelo will embolden government officials to do more of this kind of thing, (sample justification: movie theaters create jobs and are good for the life of a community), believing they can at least survive summary judgment, and maybe even win, if a condemnation is challenged in court.
Source: SIVACRACY.NET: Eminent Domain
According to this article: “The text of the holiday card that Susette Kelo sent to members of the New London Development Corp., city officials, and others involved in taking her house to make way for private development:
Here is my house that you did take
From me to you, this spell I make
Your houses, your home
Your family, your friends
May they live in misery
That never ends.
I curse you all
May you rot in hell
To each of you
I send this spell
For the rest of your lives
I wish you ill
I send this now
By the power of will
Source: Feminist Law Professors » Blog Archive » Susette Kelo Isn’t Over It
10 myths — and 10 truths — about atheism
December 26, 2006 at 7:54 pm | In Spirit | 2 Comments
An atheist is simply a person who has considered this claim, read the books and found the claim to be ridiculous. One doesn’t have to take anything on faith, or be otherwise dogmatic, to reject unjustified religious beliefs. As the historian Stephen Henry Roberts (1901-71) once said: “I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.”
Source: 10 myths — and 10 truths — about atheism – Los Angeles Times
Symbolic Order
December 26, 2006 at 10:52 am | In Domestic Violence, Law, Politics, Spirit | Leave a Comment
We can judge and adjust our actions not by the immutable standards of an invisible creator, but by the very real effects we see them cause around us.
That feedback, that awareness, is why humanist morality needs to be advanced, why work needs to be done to see it eventually usurp the religious. Until that shift transpires, wives around the world will continue to suffer at the hands of their godly husbands, men and women born to love their own gender will continue to be hated and murdered for nothing more than private displays of human tenderness, and children will continue to be taught to despise those with different superstitions than themselves.
It is time to take morality away from the prophets and give it back to the people.
Source: Symbolic Order
Unholy Holiday
December 25, 2006 at 10:52 pm | In Spirit | Leave a Comment
From that day on, Atheists around the world would greet others during the holiday season with their own salutation:
REASON’S GREETINGS.
Source: Lemons and Lollipops: A 100-Word Story: Unholy Holiday
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.