"The Uh-Ohs": A Decade of Conservative Failure
January 11, 2010 at 8:47 am | In Economy, Politics | 3 Comments
"The Uh-Ohs": A Decade of Conservative Failure
Friday 08 January 2010
by: Terrance Heath | The Campaign for America’s Future
![]()
(Photo: Dave77459; Edited: Jared Rodriguez / t r u t h o u t)"Stuff happens."
— Donald Rumsfeld on the looting of Iraq following the U.S. invasion.Forget about "the Aughts." Never mind "the Naughts." The decade just passed — and which promises to leave a lingering, bitter aftertaste — deserves a far better, more descriptive name. So for what it’s worth, I hereby dub the past ten years "The Uh-Ohs: A Decade of Conservative Failure."
It’s as good as any of the others I’ve heard. Perhaps better. Here’s why.
Because despite the wisdom of Donald Rumsfeld, "stuff" doesn’t just happen. Despite what Joel Achenbach seems to think, the debacle of the last ten years didn’t just happen. And, yes, plenty of people did see it coming. Their warnings were ignored. What followed, then, didn’t "just happen," but was the consequence of conscious choice. And, despite what Matt Yglesias seems to think, it is important to discuss and determine the causes of the various messes we find ourselves in. (Even if we find along the way the fingerprints of some Democrats Who Should Have Known Better™.)
There were plenty of messes. And, like the clean-up crew after a wild, drunken party, we’re still uncovering messes, some of which we can smell before we actually see them.
It was a decade during which conservatives controlled both Congress and the While House, and could thus enact much of their agenda. Thus, it was a decade of "uh-ohs"
Uh-oh is an ubiquitous interjection or expression of dismay in the English language, usually said in anticipation of something bad about to happen, with the sly admittance of guilt that one may have caused something bad to happen, or perceiving that something bad has already happened.
From the economy to energy to security, the "Uh-Ohs" abounded.
Uh-Oh! Conservatives turned a budget surplus we had then into the deficit we have now. It’s true. Even the Wall Street Journal had to acknowledge that the perhaps the biggest legacy of the Bush years is the huge deficit.
In other words, the deficit didn’t just happen, and it didn’t have to happen. It was the predicted outcome of conservative policy decisions.
Basically:
- Bush and congressional conservatives came into office with a $236 billion surplus projected to last years into the future. They turned it into a $412 billion deficit, in just four years.
- Bush used the existing surplus (and the $5.6 trillion surplus projected over the next ten years) as justification for huge tax cuts for the wealthy.
- Even as the costs of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan spiraled skyward, Bush refused to pay the costs of waging two wars with tax increases or other budgetary offsets.
- As a result, the government ran a deficit, and paid for some of its biggest expenditures with borrowed money.
- Ever "reality-based," in 2007 the Bush administration predicted a $61 billion surplus by 2012, but presented a 2008 budget that added $251 billion to the deficit.
Uh-Oh! Conservatives shrunk the economy. Despite what Glenn Beck and the rest of the conservative noise machine say, what happened to the economy didn’t just happen in the past year. And it didn’t just happen. It was the predictable outcome of conservative politics and policies during their decade of "uh-ohs."
- Bush and congressional conservatives who supported him, presided over the weakest economy in decades. The number of jobs increased by only about 2% during the Bush years, and the gross domestic product grew at just a 2.1% annual rate.
- It was the worst decade for the stock market, which was down 26% from where it started in 2000.
Uh-oh! It was the worst decade for jobs. Some 7 million jobs were lost (perhaps permanently), 14.5 million were left unemployed, and 6 million out-of-work adults became discouraged and stopped looking for works and are thus not even counted among the unemployed.
- Manufacturing fell to its lowest level in 26 years.
- By the end of the decade, the jobless rate reached a 26-year-high.
- There were 6.5 job seekers per job opening, by the end of the decade.
- "One in five Americans are unemployed, underemployed or just plain out of work."
- Bush finished his term with the worst track record ever on jobs since the government began keeping records in 1939.
- In fact, there’s been zero net job creation since December 1999.
- The 10% unemployment rate isn’t expected to change in 2010, and probably won’t return to pre-recession levels of less than 5% in the next six years.
This is just a beginning; a brief foray into a decade that was — but certainly didn’t have to be — filled with more items like those above. Such a decade, after all, deserves far more than one blog post.
Besides, we haven’t yet covered Iraq, Katrina, economic inequality, e. coli… With ten years of conservative failure to cover, there are definitely more "Uh-Ohs" to come.
t r u t h o u t | "The Uh-Ohs": A Decade of Conservative Failure
20score’s Journal – The (RW) Letter Everyone Is Talking About – And My Answer To It
November 27, 2009 at 8:24 pm | In Assholes, Politics, Religion | Leave a CommentHow to Deal with Bullshit Chain Mails – The Frank Factor
November 26, 2009 at 10:51 am | In Assholes, Reference and tools, Tea Party | 2 Comments
3. Use the following form (I have it color coded and boldfaced, etc..: I don’t know if it shows up like that here)
(The Form can be saved as a "draft" in your email system, and called up whenever you need it.
I’ve found that when the recipients receive this form, they freak out, and in a number of cases have asked the sender to drop them from their contact list–GOOD! Stop this torrent of right-wing lies and bullshit right at the source.
WARNING!
You have been the recipient of a chain-mail that has been proven to be:
FALSE. (paste Snopes link here)
WHY WAS THIS FALSE CHAIN-MAIL SENT TO YOU?
In his book "The Eliminationists: How Hate Talk Radicalized the American Right," David Neiwert argues that it is no accident that lies are believed by the extreme right wing. In fact, for them it doesn’t really matter whether an assertion is true; any belief, whether it is based on fact or not, is legitimized as long as the left is demonized by it. That is because the goal, for many of the extremists, is to eliminate the left as political opponents. Neiwert says that in America, this impulse to exterminate the opposition is almost uniquely confined to the right.
Thus, lies become part of the narrative of the authoritarian thinker. One would think that those in the Republican Party would discourage lying by their talk-show and Fox News brethren. When their assertions are repeatedly exposed as false, one tends to disbelieve everything they say
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
November 24, 2009 at 8:50 pm | In Assholes | Leave a CommentNot my chamber
Opposing the Employee Free Choice Act. Trying to raise $50,000 for a junk ’study’ attacking health reform. Denying global warming. Opposing sick leave for H1N1 swine flu. The bottom line? The U.S. Chamber is dangerously out of step with American values.
sarah palin how is stoning women feminist?
November 16, 2009 at 7:18 pm | In Assholes, Domestic Violence, Feminism, Law, Religion, Torture, Violence | Leave a CommentHorrifying to think that anyone could think this acceptable.
http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2008/09/17/sarah-palin-how-is-stoning-women-feminist/
or burning them to death in a ditch?
http://friendlyatheist.com/2009/04/19/burned-at-the-stake-after-being-accused-of-witchcraft/
The First of All Liberties: Making Health Care Meet All Women’s Needs by Eesha Pandit
November 16, 2009 at 1:36 pm | In Feminism, Healthcare, Politics, Science | Leave a Comment
Health and Justice
What does it mean to be healthy? Why is it, as Amiel asserted, “the first liberty?”
A measureof health is often made by assessing physical needs. This is central and inexorable. But, as reproductive justice advocates know, it is more, as well.
A woman’s ability to control her body and its reproductive capacity is central to securing overall health. Access to abortion and contraception are the tip of a very large iceberg of needs.
Acknowledging a history of eugenics and population control, the reproductive justice approach aims to ensure that women have all the medical and social resources they need to have children, or not, as well as the right to control if, when and how they become mothers. This awareness, while including access to abortion and contraception, extends to other needs, as well:
1. Maternity care, including pre- and post-natal care and infertility treatment;
2. A range of birthing options including midwives, doulas and alternative care providers;
3. Mental health services;
4. Preventative care, including but not limited to, Pap smears, vaccinations (such as HPV), childbirth education and mammograms;
5. Services that are ethnically and culturally competent;
6. Care that is sensitive to people of all different genders and sexual orientations and addresses their unique concerns;
7. Health care services that are economically and physically accessible to women and their families.The reproductive justice movement thinks more broadly about the political, cultural, economic, racial, institutional and environmental factors that pertain to bodily health. A reproductive justice-based approach considers not only what illness a woman might have, but also the social factors (environmental toxins, access to preventative care, community health education, and so on) that make her more or less prone to getting sick and more or less able to afford treatment.
This comprehensive approach changes the meaning of “health” rather dramatically. “Health” no longer simply refers to whether or not a person is sick or whether or not a woman can get reproductive health care. Instead, it diagnoses the factors that contribute to, or detract from, overall wellbeing, not merely for a single woman, but also for her family and the community in which she lives. This is what Amiel means, I believe, when he says that in health there is freedom.
this is an excerpt, please read the rest of the article at:
Fuck Your God: Religious folks aren’t very intelligent, are they?
November 11, 2009 at 11:16 am | In Religion | Leave a Comment
Sad, but true, indeed.
The goons of religion don’t get it. Speech is different from action. You don’t like queers? Fine. You want to express your hatred of homosexuality? Great, have at it. You want to kill or maim or attack them? That’s a whole different ball of wax. It is my personal conviction that religion should be outlawed from the public discourse and my First Amendment right allows me to express this. It does not, however, allow me to punch religious people in their faces. Sad, but true.
Fuck Your God: Religious folks aren’t very intelligent, are they?
yeah, what she said
November 4, 2009 at 9:43 pm | In Feminism, Healthcare | Leave a Comment
“If women have to buy abortion coverage as a rider, all men have to buy special erection insurance in case they need medical care for sexual dysfunction. As far as I’m concerned, if a man can’t get it up, it’s God’s will and I can’t in good conscience have my money touch any money that pays for that. Those Viagra ads literally make my stomach lurch. It’s very, very icky.”
Forever In Hell: 3 out of 4 Republicans Agree- Rape Victims Should STFU
October 8, 2009 at 6:44 am | In Assholes, Law, Military, Violence | Leave a Comment
3 out of 4 Republicans Agree- Rape Victims Should STFU
rape, franken, republican, justice
Due to the terrible injustice experienced by female employees of defense contractors, Al Franken suggested an amendment to the 2010 defense bill that would protect the rights of rape victims and help ensure that rapists are punished for their crimes. Guess who thinks that’s a bad idea?
Forever In Hell: 3 out of 4 Republicans Agree- Rape Victims Should STFU
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.